It’s no secret that the rate of improvement in
mobile technology is staggering when compared to almost any other
industry. Faster components, new software, and preferential treatment
for some device updates
all conspire to make your new device feel old as soon as you buy it.
Some Android phone-buyers are so stymied by this never-ending cycle that
they freeze, and wait for the right time to buy. In a market where a
minor specification bump is becoming a new SKU altogether, there may not
be such a time.
Before the official start of CES, both Verizon
and AT&T announced some new devices that you will find very
familiar. The Droid Razr Maxx is the terribly named successor to the
still-new Droid Razr. The Maxx has a much larger non-removable battery
rated a 3300mAh, and double the storage at 32GB. Make no mistake, this
is a new phone that will be taking the Razr’s place in the lineup.
That’s incredibly irritating for people that shelled out $300 for a Razr
back in November or December.
The Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket
HD is likewise the successor to the Galaxy S II Skyrocket, which was
itself a mildly improved version of the first Galaxy S II on AT&T.
The Skyrocket HD, as its name suggests, has a 720p HD Super AMOLED
screen and LTE. The first Skyrocket added LTE to the mix. This too is a
bummer for users that got a standard Galaxy S II or Skyrocket just a few
months ago.
This is a trend we see more and more — minor spec
bumps are splitting off a phone’s user base to multiple models. Verizon
has been doing it with world-band and non-world compatible Droids.
T-Mobile also replaced the HTC Sensation mere months after its debut
with the almost-identical HTC Amaze 4G, which added a much-improved
camera. There is certainly a psychological issue here in that no one
wants to feel like they made the wrong choice, but matters are
exacerbated by the way the US mobile industry works.
Almost
all phones are bought on two-year contracts. Once you’re in, the
carrier holds a multi-hundred dollar early termination fee (ETF) over
your head to keep you docile. The carrier then moves on to the next
customer, and may tempt them with a slightly better version of the phone
you just bought. After a few iterations in as many months, your device
starts to look outdated fast. It’s not like you can do anything, though;
you’re under contract.
The increasing segmentation also affects
users in a more roundabout way. When an OEM makes tiny iterative
changes, but still breaks the devices into different SKUs, that
fragments its internal development efforts. A different radio, new
screen technology, tweaked chipset, or even a storage increase can mean a
different software update needs to be built when and if the time comes.
When most of these Android devices are shipping with Android 2.3 Gingerbread, that could spell trouble.
It
is not uncommon for phones with very similar hardware to get updates at
different times. It’s happened with phones in the Droid line, as well
as the Galaxy S devices. HTC is well aware of the problems it created
for itself as it tweaked a small number of hardware bases into nearly
two-dozen phones in 2011. It has resolved to focus on a smaller number
of higher-quality experiences in 2012. Even with HTC reevaluating, other
OEMs seem dead-set on innovation via spec bumps. This means that the
situation will remain a mess, and users will continue to feel frustrated
that better versions of their own phones are coming out.
There
is probably no perfect time to buy a phone, so there’s frankly no use in
being paralyzed, constantly waiting for the right time to pounce. Your
best bet is to watch for a good deal on a fairly new device around the
holiday season. Take solace in the fact that most spec bumps are going
to be minor, and don’t be surprised when it happens. Hopefully it’s a
small difference, but if not, it’s time to grit your teeth and bear it
as you wait out that contract.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
CES 2012 proves it’s never safe to buy a new Android device
Posted by Unknown on 4:59 AM
0 comments:
Post a Comment